Buyer
Precision

Ask three sellers which accounts to chase.
You'll get three answers.

In a quick few weeks we turn the ideal customer everyone agrees on in the abstract into a written, enforced definition, so your team pursues the business worth winning and walks away from the rest.

The question your reporting cannot answer

What share of your current pipeline matches the profile of your fastest, most profitable wins, and who decided the rest belonged there?

Recognize your situation

Is this sprint for you?

Sellers disagree on the target

Ask three of your reps which accounts to chase and you get three answers. Each applies a private definition, and the pipeline fills with business nobody would have chosen on paper.

A full pipeline that underdelivers

There is no shortage of opportunities, yet win rates and cycle times disappoint. Much of the pipeline never looked like your best wins in the first place.

Scaling without focus

The product is real and the interest is real, but the team pursues anyone who shows curiosity. Pilots and exploratory conversations consume capacity without moving toward a decision.

Wrong-fit business consumes your company twice, once to win it and once to serve it

Wrong-fit pursuit typically takes 10 to 15% of sales capacity, the accounts churn faster than the ones you were built to serve, and the extra service load compounds both. The definition that would have stopped it lives in people's heads, so it never gets applied when a live deal needs a decision.

Only 17% of pipeline matches the profile of the fastest, highest-value wins

That comes from $54 billion of pipeline across 4.2 million opportunities. Five deals in six never looked like the company's best customers in the first place, yet there they sat in the pipeline. Ask three sellers which accounts to pursue and you get three answers, and it quietly fills with business nobody would have chosen on paper.

Removing just one wrong-fit business opportunity through this sprint can conservatively protect over €300,000 in annual value for a €20M company with €2M in operating profit.

Why it happens

Everyone agrees, until the next deal

Four structural patterns sit in most mid-market B2B companies and keep the real definition out of the pipeline.

The abstract agreement

Everyone nods at the ideal customer in the room, a sector, a size range, a shared sense of fit. The agreement holds only until the next deal, where each seller applies a private version of it.

The unwritten definition

The ideal customer lives in people's heads rather than on a page. A definition no one wrote down is a definition that does not exist when a live deal needs a decision.

The double cost

Wrong-fit business consumes the company twice, once to win it and again to serve it. Winning it grinds slower and leans on discounts, and keeping it brings heavier service and faster churn.

The missing no

With no written disqualifiers, the team chases anyone who shows interest. Capacity flows toward curiosity instead of toward the accounts actually worth winning.

How it works

A short, focused engagement with your team owning the result

Diagnose

We score last quarter's pipeline against the profile of your ten best customers, using your own won-loss and profitability evidence. The share that matches is your starting point. The share that does not is the work this sprint exists to do.

Build

We turn that evidence into a one-page ICP with its proof set, a written walk-away list, a fit score for live deals, and shared pursuit rules. Three sellers move from three answers to one.

Activate

Your team owns the definition and runs it. We install the fit test in the live pipeline and set up exclusion reporting, so declined business is tracked with the same status as wins.

What you walk away with

Working tools your team owns from day one

One-page ICP with proof set

A precise definition of your ideal customer, grounded in your own won-loss and profitability evidence rather than workshop opinion.

The walk-away list

Explicit disqualifiers, written down, that give the organization permission to say no before a deal consumes capacity.

The fit test & pursuit rules

A scoring discipline applied to live deals, with shared criteria for decisive pursuit, so three sellers give one answer.

Exclusion reporting

Declined business tracked with the same status as wins, so the focus holds long after the sprint ends.

When the ideal customer is written down and enforced, three sellers finally give one answer.

What this sprint fdixes

From assumed clarity to enforced focus

Buyer Precision turns the ideal customer everyone agrees on in the abstract into a definition your team enforces deal by deal.
01
Before

Ideal customer described as a sector, a size, and a nod around the table.

After

A one-page ICP defined from won-loss and profitability evidence, with a proof set behind it.

02
Before

Three sellers asked which accounts to pursue give three different answers.

After

Shared pursuit rules, so three sellers give one answer.

03
Before

Deal fit judged by gut, after capacity has already been spent.

After

A fit score applied to live deals before they consume capacity.

04
Before

No explicit disqualifiers, so the team chases anyone who shows interest.

After

A written walk-away list that gives the organization permission to say no.

05
Before

Walked-away business disappears from view.

After

Walked-away business tracked with the same status as wins.

Seeing patterns you recognise?

Let's get started as fast as possible

The 2-minute diagnostic maps your company against all twelve sprints and shows where Buyer Precision fits in your priorities.

Results

What Buyer Precision looks like in practice

Six hundred customers. Ninety-four that mattered

Family-owned trading company — €100M+ revenue, 646 commercial partners worldwide.

A family-owned trading company had crossed €100 million after three years of fast growth, serving 646 partners worldwide, every one at the same service level. When the portfolio was decomposed, 94 customers, 15% of the base, delivered 82% of revenue and 79% of margin. The other 552 delivered 21% of margin while generating more than 70% of all quality problems, and the company was spending more every year to serve a shrinking, loss-generating tail. Buyer Precision named the 94 to protect and the tail to walk away from.

82%

of revenue and 79% of margin came from just 15% of the customer base. The other 85% delivered 21% of margin and over 70% of all quality problems.

TOPO / Gartner
The cost of a sharp definition
68%

higher win rates at ICP-focused companies, which also earn 40% more marketing-sourced revenue and close 28% higher contract values. Precision compounds across the funnel.

Linkedin B2B Institute · FORRESTER
The alignment gap
16%

is how often sales and marketing target the same accounts, even though 82% of executives believe the two are aligned. A shared definition closes that gap.

What comes next

Buyer Precision sets up the next move

Once the target is defined and enforced, two sprints turn that focus into commercial action.

Ready to discuss how much of your pipeline is off-target?

You've read enough to know whether this fits your situation

The next step is a 30-minute conversation where we assess whether Buyer Precision is the right starting point for your business.

Every quarter without a written, enforced definition, your best sellers spend their capacity on business nobody would have chosen, and the accounts worth winning go uncontested.